Well, hearing nothing back, I've gone ahead and looked at Dimension's patents at the USPTO. Again.
I'm not sure what it is that you are hoping I will see but I think the important question is whether the granted patents conflict in some important way with anything Tmmi purports to have developed or own. I don't know the answer to that but it is the fundamental question that the USPTO will address when deciding whether to grant Tmmi's patent applications.
Was there some other point? I agree that Dim appears to have a number of patents, none of them are exact duplicates, and one was significantly invalidated. I'm not seeing that Dim is boasting anywhere about the invalidated one.
I think the status of the patents is a far more important consideration than the question of the license to VDK 2 -- a license concerning use of property that is now public domain.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
