This post of yours is a good example of why the website needs to be updated and clarified. It inspires confused thinking. QED.
Judge Gonzales has found that DFMI is the exclusive licensee of the license called VDK 2. This means that Tmmi is not the owner of this license.
A claim on the website that Tmmi owns VDK 2 is unquestionably inconsistent with the Judge's ruling. But I think that is a small problem, if a problem at all, because the Judge's ruling may be appealed. The greater problem is that the website is full of contradictory descriptions about the nature of the technology and other factual errors, like the address of their office and contact information.
If you are correct, and VDK 2 is really VDK 1-9, then it would follow that Tmmi is not the owner of VDK 1-9 either. However, the judge has made no such finding, and there are many reasons to think that VDK 1-9 is not identical to VDK 2.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
