News Focus
News Focus
Followers 57
Posts 8395
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2009

Re: obiterdictum post# 376219

Thursday, 01/05/2017 12:14:27 PM

Thursday, January 05, 2017 12:14:27 PM

Post# of 866937
I fully agree. Nixon vs. GSA doesn't really serve as a rallying cry to presidents wanting to withhold information. It is merely useful in determining (for the first time that I know of) that former presidents do have a legal right to retain their files after leaving the office (apparently for 12 years).

As far as the other links, 44 U.S. Code Chapter 22 is a law I didn't know. I thought that the law for presidential ownership of records only existed as stare decisis. I didn't realize it was codified anywhere. That is fantastic to know.

The executive order, I have read before, but had forgotten about it. It does answer my original question very well...the procedure around claiming a pres priv. Of course, you never know with these orders. They could be gone in 2 weeks for all we know.

Thank you obi! As I said, this is an area of law I don't know very well...and you are the only one to provide any useful information on the topic.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent FNMA News