Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[Protector]

north, that would be explained by what Keenan once said. For 'intend' you need to prove what the woman was thinking. The way it was presented now allowed the sabotage to be masked as a human error.

The keeping of separate administration, hiding behind the blinding process and saying you think that you would harm the blinding if you would have done this or that or not have done this or that all makes it look like the poor woman didn't have a clue of what she was doing. hence breach of contract within the limits of the contract boundaries (settled at 600K$) but no provable sabotage.

If PPHM needs to include FRAUD then they will be expected to come up with something that PROVES INTEND and adding that without being in the possession of such prove was very probably a ticket for loosing. Constructed fraud on the other end and CSM not playing open cards can be proven by JB's and her bosses testimony. SOMEONE at CSM (JB) KNEW and didn't tell and kept the customer in the dark. That is constructed fraud.