AI
Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:16:13 AM
funny I can´t control myself...keep promising not to engage in these games, but I like games too much...so to all behind some buttons:
The best I got are my shares, my belief and all the info we dug up and are digging up to make a completer adnas picture. Adnas´ signatureDNA, I believe, is becoming the most important feature to distinguish fake from real, dangerous from safe, ethically wrong from right etcetera. It´s made for the biggest companies, it´s trusted and helped by government, it can afford to take it´s time and not hurry because of that and it´s uniqueness. I kinda like it adnas is not focussed on shareholders. It is slowly paving the way to implement it in many different verticals BIG time when time is ripe, and time is getting closer to be ripe every day.
Next to that I tend to be irrational yes about the forces involved in this stock and behind adnas. I have no clue about which ones and suggest anything I can come up with because I know nothing. I do have a chrystalclear all cloaking theory about it all but that is fantasy...
Types like SoL, Shanghaishark, Lillydogagent, DTC, Blueberry, Hawaisurfer skating downhill, and maybe you all fit this theory too. I think you operate to apply downward pressure to decrease retail%. Don´t know why eventually, but I have done my DD real good, like all the longs I presume. I am a rookie as a matter of fact compared to most here. Am invested as of may 2015 and to eradicate Speed of Lights´ suggestion there are no longs with predictions about future pps in the last 10 years: I saw this peak in aug/sept/oct 2015 coming (take a guess as to whether I made some money or not)...
I am insensitive about a lot, except BS and untruths about adnas. Bears post about pps and dilution facts (those are true numbers of course) but besides that you post only vague and/or nonproven "explanations" and insinuations about the "why". All bears can do is say: "there must be something bad going on because the numbers indicate it or because expectations were noy yet met"... that´s onesides blindness. That is at least as much irrational and non-proven as is my belief that big things are to arrive. There is one big difference between bears and me though: I am MOTIVATED to the bone and I deliver info !!! If you were as motivated as I am, you would come up at least with proof of malpractice or not-to-discard-facts of adnas being fake. There have been weak attempts in shedding light upon "competitors", but those had no ground and were laughable and sometimes checked and of course falsificated. Hey, the competitors I have come up with and shared info about in here were much more interesting!
So now you bother no more trying to have adnas tech appear weak and obsolete like you were last years. Those arguments hardly ever come anymore...Last attempts concerned a thinfilmcompany from Norway and Authentix claiming to serve 7 big pharmaceutic companies. IS THAT ALL YOU GOT?
So to all the bears: come up with proof! The more you show up with nothing, the more I shine light upon the nothingness. The lower the PPS, the larger my stake cos I keep adding. I relatively add a higher% than the dilution% is too and will maintain doing that.
But I think it´s time to raise it. It´s been long enough. I think anyone left at this point deserves to be awarded and will be awarded. So if I were the only one left in adnas, and the MarketMaker were to chose to discourage me even more with lower pps or to "call it a day" and open up the stock and let that tidelwave rock the boat...I would advise to do the latter. If not: accept that I will get more shares.
I promise again to only come up with info and ignore the bears
The best I got are my shares, my belief and all the info we dug up and are digging up to make a completer adnas picture. Adnas´ signatureDNA, I believe, is becoming the most important feature to distinguish fake from real, dangerous from safe, ethically wrong from right etcetera. It´s made for the biggest companies, it´s trusted and helped by government, it can afford to take it´s time and not hurry because of that and it´s uniqueness. I kinda like it adnas is not focussed on shareholders. It is slowly paving the way to implement it in many different verticals BIG time when time is ripe, and time is getting closer to be ripe every day.
Next to that I tend to be irrational yes about the forces involved in this stock and behind adnas. I have no clue about which ones and suggest anything I can come up with because I know nothing. I do have a chrystalclear all cloaking theory about it all but that is fantasy...
Types like SoL, Shanghaishark, Lillydogagent, DTC, Blueberry, Hawaisurfer skating downhill, and maybe you all fit this theory too. I think you operate to apply downward pressure to decrease retail%. Don´t know why eventually, but I have done my DD real good, like all the longs I presume. I am a rookie as a matter of fact compared to most here. Am invested as of may 2015 and to eradicate Speed of Lights´ suggestion there are no longs with predictions about future pps in the last 10 years: I saw this peak in aug/sept/oct 2015 coming (take a guess as to whether I made some money or not)...
I am insensitive about a lot, except BS and untruths about adnas. Bears post about pps and dilution facts (those are true numbers of course) but besides that you post only vague and/or nonproven "explanations" and insinuations about the "why". All bears can do is say: "there must be something bad going on because the numbers indicate it or because expectations were noy yet met"... that´s onesides blindness. That is at least as much irrational and non-proven as is my belief that big things are to arrive. There is one big difference between bears and me though: I am MOTIVATED to the bone and I deliver info !!! If you were as motivated as I am, you would come up at least with proof of malpractice or not-to-discard-facts of adnas being fake. There have been weak attempts in shedding light upon "competitors", but those had no ground and were laughable and sometimes checked and of course falsificated. Hey, the competitors I have come up with and shared info about in here were much more interesting!
So now you bother no more trying to have adnas tech appear weak and obsolete like you were last years. Those arguments hardly ever come anymore...Last attempts concerned a thinfilmcompany from Norway and Authentix claiming to serve 7 big pharmaceutic companies. IS THAT ALL YOU GOT?
So to all the bears: come up with proof! The more you show up with nothing, the more I shine light upon the nothingness. The lower the PPS, the larger my stake cos I keep adding. I relatively add a higher% than the dilution% is too and will maintain doing that.
But I think it´s time to raise it. It´s been long enough. I think anyone left at this point deserves to be awarded and will be awarded. So if I were the only one left in adnas, and the MarketMaker were to chose to discourage me even more with lower pps or to "call it a day" and open up the stock and let that tidelwave rock the boat...I would advise to do the latter. If not: accept that I will get more shares.
I promise again to only come up with info and ignore the bears
