Again not a scientist but please elaborate as to where this was proven...
"when the data mining proved that binding is unstable, unpredictable, and subject to unsubscribed variances"
"Unstable" as in from person to person, IMO
"Unstable" as in the amount of antiPs administered. Remember, "higher volume" antiPS antibody in the blood stream correlates to lower available b2gp1 to bind. This is the curve of diminishing returns, as related to b2gp1 and availability, IMO.
"Unpredictable" as in undefined parameters regarding cohorts in Sunrise trial. For example, what diet, drug use, age, weight, metabolic readings etc, contributed to B2GP1 levels?
Regarding "drug use", I believe that there is a direct link between B2GP1 levels and statin use, either prior to Sunrise, or during the trial.
"Unknown variances" as in 200/240 range, but what is known about the readings above and below this threshold?
How many twotonelephants does that make?. And what about "cross reactivity of PS and B2GP1.?? Do these contribute to binding "unpredictability", "Instability", "Unknown variances" and Bavituximab's MOA, efficacy etc..
All the best, John
Disclaimer: Every post, and all my views are only speculative. Do not invest money or any other resources based on these post or opinions. Best of luck and do your own due diligence!