Biotech Values

[iwfal]

The devil is always in the details. So it all depends on what one means by "FDA reform." If it means, for instance, hiring more qualified FDA reviewers, I think most of us would see this as a good thing. If "FDA reform" means instituting the ideas in McClellan's "Critical Path Initiative," then that would also be a good thing,

I think it is likely that 'reform' in this case means something along the lines of "21st Century Cures" act, or, with Trump, something even more extreme (some of the candidates for HHS being bandied about are, frankly, nut jobs.)

Note that I have seen not one scintilla of indication that either of your two potential reforms (more qualified reviewers or McClellan's Critical Path) are even under serious consideration by the politicians (and that is where this 'reform' is coming from).