Hey mabbers.
Your question about the queques is of interest to me. I cannot try to answer it this afternoon but promise to give it a go in the next few days.
What I "know" is only from my own observations of what seem to be tendencies is certain situations. I have never seen this subject discussed in books or on the internet. My statement today was about as certain as I get it There is a huge amount of work required. One cannot do even a few seconds of anything else. The continuing "train" of queues entries and a reasonable judgement of what clues they may give has been good enough for me to use to tie up my brain from all else for several consecutive, say,five or ten minutes (at most) periods. One trouble is that
"pros" throw in false signals (in my judgement) often enough to screw up any unsuspecting observer, and just as quickly delete that for another stab. Is this real, one can ask. All I say is that Roy's mind thinks so enough to look for good clues, particularly looking for places to not dismount too soon. How often do we see posts on our own board where ruefully it is admitted that too much was "left on the table". I'm telling you, if I get a double or triple and later find that I "could" have held for a ten spot, that's a reason for trying to find a better exit procedure. Can you believe that I recently saw a real 40X pass by in one of the stock options that are often traded on this board. Okay, they are rare. Useless to wait for the chance.
That doesn't keep me from working the crowd, so to speak to try to squeeze what I could out of NFLX puts, IWM puts, and TSLA puts. Pretty sure I did some good. I watched the ques when I could. That's all the "evidence" I can point to today.
AI
