THE JUDGMENT IS VERY VERY CLEAR THAT THE AD HOC TRUSTEE WAS NOT PROPERLY APPOINTED.
[71] The Court is hearing an appeal from the interlocutory decision of the Council refusing the preliminary application by the appellant for a stay of proceedings on the ground of invalidity of the complaint because of the illegality of the appointment of the ad hoc trustee who filed it.
[73] Finally, the Court considers that the Board could not confirm the appointment of the respondent as trustee ad hoc and ratify his actions in the file, by means of the resolution of January 28, 2016 59 .