News Focus
News Focus
Followers 79
Posts 10423
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2014

Re: clawmann post# 461557

Thursday, 09/08/2016 11:20:21 AM

Thursday, September 08, 2016 11:20:21 AM

Post# of 749756
I am absolutely with you, the language is about the claim, only the claim! The claim is accepted by the FDIC as it is and will not be reduced and so the pro rata share with the other claims with the same priority is fixed. In no way does the language assure that the claim will be paid in full.

I don't say it will not, but one can NOT derive from the settlement language that this claim will be paid in full.

The language refers to the size and class of the allowed claim. It cannot be read as meaning that DB is guaranteed to be paid the full value of that claim.

let's just note that we disagree on the meaning.

But, as I have repeatedly stated, I am not saying DB won't be paid in full, but that would require significant additional money coming into the receivership, and at this moment I see no evidence that that will happen. Only theories have been posted, theories that assume things for which there is currently no evidence, only questionable assumptions.


---------------------------------------------------------
- Just my personal opinion, no investment advice! -
- I am long WMIH, FNMA and FMCC -
---------------------------------------------------------

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today