News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257684
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 123050
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: Bickema post# 204074

Sunday, 09/04/2016 6:06:12 PM

Sunday, September 04, 2016 6:06:12 PM

Post# of 257684
Re: RVNC's acquisition of BTRX patents

…Allergan…must…have been well aware of these patents for some time and had no inclination to purchase them…

The first part of your statement is correct, but the second part of your statement is more nuanced.

AGN was, in fact, engaged in negotiation to license the BTRX patents as part of a larger transaction, but they didn’t consummate a deal. I don’t know whether the failure to consummate a deal was due to a disagreement on value or some other reason.

…a major oversight by Allergan considering Revance paid only $2 million upfront.

That’s the wrong way to look at it, IMO. The cumulative cost of RVNC’s deal with BTRX will be $18M (the amount payable to BTRX if various milestones are met) plus whatever RVNC spends developing any indications it wouldn't otherwise have developed. The cost of developing such additional indications will clearly swamp the $18M in direct payments to BTRX, and it is this higher (unquantified) amount that may have persuaded AGN to forego a deal with BTRX.

True, AGN could have acquired the BTRX patents strictly for defense (i.e. with no intention of developing additional indications covered by the patents), but they may have been too arrogant to deign to employ such a maneuver.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today