Tornado Alley (PROG)

[conix]

Janice--the parallels are non-existent. Reagan left office and Nancy was not a Cabinet Secretary with a lot of influence AFTER he received that $2 million with a lot of influence.

If anyone here thinks this Reagan scenario even approaches the same thing about Hillary as Cabinet Secretary and the Clinton Foundation, please articulate how.

As for Ambassadorships for sale to big donors--I disagree with both parties. I do not support the Citizens United decision. And Dems say they do not either--yet they support one of the most egregious "Pay for Play" politicians in history.

The Clinton Foundation is NOT known for low administrative costs/charitable effort ratios. You may want to check your numbers. Charity Navigator will not even try to rate the Clinton Foundation. If Hillary wins--that Foundation needs to be subsumed by the Gates Foundation--a foundation without the obvious avenues for influence peddling--or the appearance to donors that they may get an audience with the President and/or any member of her Administration.

Boy, when you are liberal and leftist and you have learned to love Hillary, blindness and intellectual honesty just goes out the window.

I have been intellectually honest to say that I do not like Trump. He is arrogant, lies, blindly ambitious, and believes that regulations do not apply to him.

Which, come to think of it, describes Hillary to a T.