Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,580.06
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
29,532.40
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
51,032.46
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
93.76
(
2.62%
)
Bitcoin
72,770.88
(
-1.07%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 173300
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

gitreal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 205
Posts 46688
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 03/21/2012

gitreal

Member Level

Re: gempicker post# 163862

Monday, 08/01/2016 8:07:32 PM

Monday, August 01, 2016 8:07:32 PM

Post# of 173300
No, if you encounter mineralization that is significant enough to count as a discovery, there is no need for a "second discovery". A result of 200 feet of 0.4% copper would be more than enough! Even I would get pretty excited by that!!

Even a 30-foot run of 0.4% copper would be enough. It would show that ore-grade copper is present, in the right rocks, and as predicted. JB could promote the crap out of that and real money would flow in.

Mining Company Research Board http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=21803

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent LBSR News
More LBSR News