News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 112759
Next 10
Followers 5
Posts 58
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/11/2016

Re: hikerman444 post# 73533

Saturday, 07/09/2016 3:36:00 PM

Saturday, July 09, 2016 3:36:00 PM

Post# of 112759
This was addressed several times, but the answer is one that appears unwelcomed.

The company does not have to deal with any ill filed USPTO application of a trademark that is in violation of a similar "Previous Art" ruling (confusion within a marketplace). The subject was dead before it even started.

That trademark will be invalidated with or without intervention. That is the law. People are welcome to petition the USPTO to change its protocols.

Les, I would not waste a single moment addressing this comical topic. That is why when people message me about it, I simply skip right over the message.

"We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances."
- W. M. Thorburn, "Occam's razor", Mind, 24, pp. 287–288, 1915.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y