AFTER SPEAKING TO NORM I CALLED EDWARD SULLIVAN, WE SPOKE FOR ABOUT 10 MINUTES REGARDING VIRTUAL SOURCING INC AND NORM AND HE LAUGHED WHEN I REPEATED WHAT NORM SAID ABOUT NOT BEING AFFILIATED WITH PGCX... EDWARD DOESN'T FEEL THAT OUR LOSSES OR THAT FACT THAT THEY (NORM AND MARIO) INTRODUCED UNAUTHORIZED SHARES TO THE MARKET HAVE ANY RELEVANCE TO THE CURRENT SEC CASE. HOWEVER, AFTER A SHORT DISCUSSION ABOUT PRESS AND NEWS RELEASES THAT VIRTUAL PUT OUT BEFORE THE S1 APPROVAL, HE FELT THERE MIGHT BE GROUNDS FOR A FRAUD CASE. HE REFERRED ME TO COLLEGE AND WE SPOKE AS WELL. IF THERE WAS NEVER AN ACTUAL CONTRACT IN PLACE ABOUT "KRUD KLEEN" OR A CONTRACT TO DELIVER "X" AMOUNT OF THAT PRODUCT, THAT THAT WOULD BE A DIRECT FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION OF PGCX...
I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND LINKS TO THE KRUD KLEEN RELEASE BUT I THINK IF ANY THAT WAS ONE OF THE LEAST RELIABLE/MOST B.S. RELEASES... ANY ONE FIND A LINK TO IT SO I CAN ATTACH IT TO MY FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE SEC...
ALSO, IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO BE FORMALLY INVOLVED WITH THE COMPLAINT, OR HAS OTHER SUGGESTIONS/DIRECTIONS FOR THEM TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES, PLEASE HELP.
FURTHER MORE, AFTER SPEAKING WITH NORM, THEN THE SEC/EDWARD, THE SEC HAS CALLED ME TWICE REGARDING NORM AND MY CONVERSATION...
INTERESTING... I WONDER IF BLATANTLY DENYING ANY INVOLVEMENT WITH THE COMPANY TO A SHARE HOLDER IS A VIOLATION IN AND OF ITSELF... GOOD THING I RECORD MY PHONE CALLS...
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
