If there really are MCIG execs posting in this forum - a couple of observations.
1) The execs are using an alias, therefore, nothing those accounts post in a forum can be construed as an official PR statement. 2) IMO, the motive in terms of why an exec might be participating in a forum; albeit desperate. It's called DAMAGE CONTROL.
MCIG has clearly been in DAMAGE CONTROL MODE SINCE THAT LETTER CAME OUT WHERE PAUL SIGNED A LETTER GIVING AWAY ALL RIGHTS TO THE VITASTIK TRADEMARK TO AL SANTOS BACK IN FEBRUARY 2015.
IF IT WERE NOT FOR THAT LETTER, SHAREHOLDERS WOULD NOT HAVE ANY INFORMATION TODAY REGARDING THE VITASTIK DEBACLE.
IMO, if execs are indeed spending time in forums to build "good will" - AGAIN - I WOULD SUGGEST THEY DO SO THRU MORE FORMAL METHODS SUCH AN OFFICIAL PR VIA LEGITIMATE NEWS OUTLET LIKE MARKETSHARE (NOT SEEKING ALPHA).
If MCIG wants to EARN BACK the trust that they have lost on their own and by their own devices, maybe they should EXECUTE and then PR their SUCCESSES.
I'd suggest going to the office, implementing plans, and meeting deadlines. Talk Is Cheap. MCIG is talking a lot and doesn't even have a big stick to shake.
"Now I do notice that there seems to be a lot of message (boards). I (personally) don’t go to them. I get advice from them in once a while, but there seems to be some points of cyber (bullying) and the stuff that happens on the messages boards.
We've recently learnt that our competitors, one of our competitors has taken on this tactic of going in there and speaking bad about the company as a way to (thwart) our shareholder interest." ~Mike of Misdirection
"I think the company is trying to get the word out and correct past execs mistakes. I think that an exec reaching out to board should be welcomed not chastised.
If Mcig is trying to "prop" up stock, than they suck at! And board negatives are self professed non owners. The fact they are reaching out and being slapped back is typical for non-owners but owners want them to keep trying and get the word out." ~words of naivete.
RISHEL, I did not see your post inviting me personally to a verbal discussion. Perhaps that is unfortunate. I do have your email, so i may attempt to reach out to you.
In regard to the rollies photo request. You could consider posting pictures to the mcig website, where they will not get deleted. If you do, i would not conclude it was because i requested, or challenged you, which i admit i did. I would conclude it was to keep invesors and potential investors informed. I have to concede that pictures, or lack there of, may not prove anything in the end, as snoody posted convincing pictures of what looked yo be a co2 extractor that never came to pass. To be fair, though, those pictures were never officially posted to the mcig website and i could tell snoody was a complete loose cannon and possible liability at that point.
For what it's worth, the posts I've seen from you have been informative.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
