Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,109.14
(
-0.24%
)
US TECH 100
25,922.05
(
-0.12%
)
Dow Jones
49,442.56
(
-0.01%
)
Brent Oil
90.68
(
-2.14%
)
Bitcoin
75,993.48
(
2.89%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 38496
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

ranger_7

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 308
Posts 23529
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 09/14/2015

ranger_7

Re: 1manband post# 25371

Tuesday, 06/21/2016 6:42:35 PM

Tuesday, June 21, 2016 6:42:35 PM

Post# of 38496
ROTFLMFAO - "That is absolutely not possible and will not happen. And even if the judge somehow had a fit of temporary insanity and somehow did so, the ruling would definitely be overturned by the Court of Appeals as it would violate the law."

If the judge somehow had a fit of temporary insanity I would have a LOT more money before this even made it to Court of Appeals. There will be no need for that, commons will stay intact IMO.

Trade at your own risk. Do not make any financial decisions based on anything that I write.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today