You are getting way ahead of yourself. Yes, I agree the numbers look really incredible depending how you package and repackage it. Makes sense to me, too.
But the assumption here is that EPGL is going to be a major player in this forward-looking scenario that, to a large extent, is probably on its way. But I am not impressed with the way EPGL is approaching it. In a very large way EPGL is STILL invisible to the marketplace in general. If the big players are intending to dominate this arena they're going to do it regardless of what EPGL does or doesn't have. They're the ones with deep pockets, big time lawyers, and name recognition. They're eating machines. EPGL at best is a snack.
If I take reality out of the scenario, yes, I like EPGL and their patents. I would be thrilled if they hit paydirt.
Keep reality in there, and the sharks win. Even Steve Jobs bought a development lab that DARPA was mothballing and stored it away with ideas for its use down the road. After regaining control of Apple he reactivated it. It was SIRI. Voice interaction on a smart phone.
Little EPGL has patents and hopes and dreams. Big Wall St. has power, money and most of all, big competitors that release sharks when they want something. Talking trillions? They are bugging every room in Hayes' home, car and office if it's potentially that valuable. To me, that's what is missing with EPGL. Mild interest from big companies and their direct competitors.
It's got to be a buyout. That's the only scenario that I see EPGL hitting a one-time paydirt, never to be heard from again. I honestly hope I'm wrong.
