InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,469.30
(
0.39%
)
US TECH 100
19,174.00
(
1.14%
)
Dow Jones
39,112.16
(
-0.76%
)
Brent Oil
84.54
(
0.42%
)
Bitcoin
62,017.72
(
0.35%
)
Post# of 8307
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

ItsMyOption

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 70
Posts 3515
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/23/2006

ItsMyOption

Re: marty009 post# 8141

Wednesday, 05/18/2016 11:07:23 AM

Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:07:23 AM

Post# of 8307
Marty009, IMO it is better to not send a copy or form letter. Judges do not like to see the same letter many times. We only need two objection to force a june 2nd hearing.

I am sure counsel for the Ohio group will do a good job proving that Judge Walrath must deny that objection.

Marty,I did make a list of us IHUB LTW holders and listed my e-mail, but did not get anything from you. Did you not opt-in or sign that release?

It is my opinion that all those LTW that did not sign that release have a very good change of payment before end of summer. JPM will not want to litigate this in front of a jury.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up