Thursday, April 14, 2016 1:23:58 PM
"Look up definition of Duress and Coered"
I know the definitions very well.
"Appears one can feel duress when coerced (threaten if one does not perform against what one would not do )"
That is not correct. Duress occurs when there is the use of UNLAWFUL force or threat of UNLAWFUL force thru physical or economic harm in order to force someone to perform an UNLAWFUL act. Basically, it is threatening someone thru harm if they don't do something illegal for the person threatening them. Duress is usually used as a defense to an illegal act, such as arson or theft...and can also be used to defend a contract that is entered into wrongfully. However, threatening to sue someone is not a threat covered by Duress...because sueing someone is a LAWFUL act. Simply put, the board could have said NO and then gone thru the lawsuit of obstruction where a court would determine if there was any or not. So, no...the definition you gave is incorrect, and would never be acknowledged in a court of law.
"Big-yank I am amazed how much leeway you allow government. To be a shareholder and be so intense against any evidence that gov is a bunch of fkn crooks. Just amazing or not a shareholder. Maybe a paid gov troll ?"
I am a shareholder, and have been holding since 2008 at 57 cents. And like all shareholders, I owe a responsibility to myself to be honest about the case as it exists. When you claim things like Fraud or Duress, you better have evidence to support it, or all you are doing is making yourself feel better all the way to the poor house. Believe me...when this stock increases in PPS, I'll be VERY happy. But, I'm not going to rely on false claims supported only by conspiracy websites in order to make my investing decisions. Also, as a law school graduate, I owe a duty to uphold a level of honesty in my legal analysis. Soooo....I've never heard the term "Big-Yank" before...but I don't allow the government leeway. I merely am waiting for ACTUAL EVIDENCE to be presented, rather than conspiracy theories that will NEVER be upheld in court.
I know the definitions very well.
"Appears one can feel duress when coerced (threaten if one does not perform against what one would not do )"
That is not correct. Duress occurs when there is the use of UNLAWFUL force or threat of UNLAWFUL force thru physical or economic harm in order to force someone to perform an UNLAWFUL act. Basically, it is threatening someone thru harm if they don't do something illegal for the person threatening them. Duress is usually used as a defense to an illegal act, such as arson or theft...and can also be used to defend a contract that is entered into wrongfully. However, threatening to sue someone is not a threat covered by Duress...because sueing someone is a LAWFUL act. Simply put, the board could have said NO and then gone thru the lawsuit of obstruction where a court would determine if there was any or not. So, no...the definition you gave is incorrect, and would never be acknowledged in a court of law.
"Big-yank I am amazed how much leeway you allow government. To be a shareholder and be so intense against any evidence that gov is a bunch of fkn crooks. Just amazing or not a shareholder. Maybe a paid gov troll ?"
I am a shareholder, and have been holding since 2008 at 57 cents. And like all shareholders, I owe a responsibility to myself to be honest about the case as it exists. When you claim things like Fraud or Duress, you better have evidence to support it, or all you are doing is making yourself feel better all the way to the poor house. Believe me...when this stock increases in PPS, I'll be VERY happy. But, I'm not going to rely on false claims supported only by conspiracy websites in order to make my investing decisions. Also, as a law school graduate, I owe a duty to uphold a level of honesty in my legal analysis. Soooo....I've never heard the term "Big-Yank" before...but I don't allow the government leeway. I merely am waiting for ACTUAL EVIDENCE to be presented, rather than conspiracy theories that will NEVER be upheld in court.
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
