News Focus
News Focus
Followers 26
Posts 1424
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/07/2010

Re: Protector post# 261110

Thursday, 04/07/2016 7:10:34 PM

Thursday, April 07, 2016 7:10:34 PM

Post# of 347009
The point CP, is not what the phase 2 data was, could have been or what was said when, but your ASSUMPTION of what was used in the Phase 3 design. You constantly make statements that BAVI must have had a MOS of 14+ months in the phase 3 based on their statement that the BAVI arm performed as they expected, when the TRUTH is you don't know how they expected the BAVI arm to perform. PPHM never gave that information and your calculations are filled with your ASSUMPTIONS, not facts.

That is the simple point that you don't seem to be able to grasp.

FFTT

JBAIN
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y