Interesting Truth, that all that spending on attorney fees spent PRIOR to the shareholder letter? Is that your contention as to why Scott hasn't done very little in the past 8 years including drilling in the right spots? That is quite a stretch on your part.
I was a strong supporter of Scott for years making many enemies here. I have been in contact with Scott personally a few times and always getting an answer. The past year however he has gone silent and it remains my contention that when the SOE deal went south he panicked and did some very questionable things. He has a lot of explaining to do so maybe he should put some of that money into answering the shareholders and living up to his fiduciary responsibilities.
Since apparently you remain a big supporter use that relationship to get him to respond to the letter that wasn't generated by an attorney. it shouldn't take an attorney thus no cost to do just that, communicate with the shareholders.