Tuesday, December 29, 2015 1:20:10 PM
As one of our former presidents once said in court, it depends on what the definition of "is" is. I find the term "containerization" unclear when compared to the prevailing definition.
Like many here, I'm not a tech expert, but for example:
Containerization vs. Virtualization via Traditional Hypervisors
The foundation for containerization lies in the LinuX Containers (LXC) format, which is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. As a result, containerization only works in Linux environments and can only run Linux applications.
This is in contrast with traditional hypervisors like VMware's ESXi, Xen or KVM, wherein applications can run on Windows or any other operating system that supports the hypervisor.
Another key difference with containerization as opposed to traditional hypervisors is that containers share the Linux kernel used by the operating system running the host machine, which means any other containers running on the host machine will also be using the same Linux kernel.
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/C/containerization.html
Besides, it appears Microsoft is working on its own containerization technology:
Docker Not the Only Containerization Option
Docker may have been the first to bring attention to containerization, but it's no longer the only container system option. CoreOS recently released a streamlined alternative to Docker called Rocket.
And Canonical, developers of the Ubuntu Linux-based operating system, has announced the LXD containerization engine for Ubuntu, which will also be integrated with OpenStack.
Microsoft is working on its own containerization technology called Drawbridge, which will likely be featured in Windows Server and Azure in the future. And Spoon is another Windows alternative that will enabled containerized applications to be run on any Windows machine that has Spoon installed, regardless of the underlying infrastructure.
Where does that leave GW with Drawbridge and others? Where is the competitive advantage in play? I tried searching in the past to no avail.
Like many here, I'm not a tech expert, but for example:
Containerization vs. Virtualization via Traditional Hypervisors
The foundation for containerization lies in the LinuX Containers (LXC) format, which is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. As a result, containerization only works in Linux environments and can only run Linux applications.
This is in contrast with traditional hypervisors like VMware's ESXi, Xen or KVM, wherein applications can run on Windows or any other operating system that supports the hypervisor.
Another key difference with containerization as opposed to traditional hypervisors is that containers share the Linux kernel used by the operating system running the host machine, which means any other containers running on the host machine will also be using the same Linux kernel.
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/C/containerization.html
Besides, it appears Microsoft is working on its own containerization technology:
Docker Not the Only Containerization Option
Docker may have been the first to bring attention to containerization, but it's no longer the only container system option. CoreOS recently released a streamlined alternative to Docker called Rocket.
And Canonical, developers of the Ubuntu Linux-based operating system, has announced the LXD containerization engine for Ubuntu, which will also be integrated with OpenStack.
Microsoft is working on its own containerization technology called Drawbridge, which will likely be featured in Windows Server and Azure in the future. And Spoon is another Windows alternative that will enabled containerized applications to be run on any Windows machine that has Spoon installed, regardless of the underlying infrastructure.
Where does that leave GW with Drawbridge and others? Where is the competitive advantage in play? I tried searching in the past to no avail.
Recent ANY News
- Form DEFM14A - Definitive proxy statement relating to merger or acquisition • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:18:32 PM
- Form DEFA14A - Additional definitive proxy soliciting materials and Rule 14(a)(12) material • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 08:07:40 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 08:07:10 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/27/2026 08:34:09 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/14/2026 12:22:13 AM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/11/2026 12:06:08 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 09:02:01 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 09:01:18 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 09:00:26 PM
- Sphere 3D Reports Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Results • Newsfile • 03/06/2026 10:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/06/2026 10:02:37 PM
- Cathedra Bitcoin and Sphere3D Announce Business Combination • Newsfile • 03/05/2026 10:50:00 PM
- Sphere3D and Cathedra Bitcoin Announce Business Combination • Newsfile • 03/05/2026 10:32:00 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/12/2026 09:15:38 PM
- Sphere 3D Provides Business and Financial Update • Newsfile • 02/06/2026 04:15:00 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2026 09:16:50 PM
- Form 3 - Initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/22/2025 10:08:03 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/22/2025 09:15:46 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/11/2025 05:15:08 AM
- Form 424B3 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(3)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/10/2025 09:15:14 PM
- Form DEFA14A - Additional definitive proxy soliciting materials and Rule 14(a)(12) material • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/05/2025 09:05:12 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/05/2025 09:01:26 PM
- Form S-3 - Registration statement under Securities Act of 1933 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/21/2025 09:05:46 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/18/2025 09:09:14 PM
