Now, let me address the three years. ITS BEEN THREE YEARS SINCE THEY RECEIVED THE LAWFUL INTERCEPT PATENT! PERIOD! And no licsening agreement! Not sure what it is that is so difficult to understand? .........Why have they not pursued an infringement lawsuit by now? Is it, that it's not being used? Or is it, that they don't have the man hood to sue? I'll take the latter. It's excuse after excuse. They're too scared to sue. No one wants that. Too costly and time consuming. Years before anything would happen.
This argument isn't even valid IMO. Nor is your constant complaint about timeframe. It's like complaining that VPLM has $0 revenue. No kidding, that wasn't there game plan. Their game plan has been very clear from the beginning. To sell the patents as a whole. Not one at a time. Not to license. To sell.
They never wanted to go the lawsuit route. They are clear on that. They have always hoped for a buyer. To constantly say they don't have the man hood is ridiculous. It's very smart that they haven't gone this route yet. They would have lost, IMO. Now, with all child patents, they are ready. I’m fully confident VPLM is ready and willing.
I for one am thankful for Emil’s patience. My biggest worry was that he would sell out too soon. He’s ready to fight and now has everything to win, IMO. It’s Dalton time.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
