News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2
Posts 542
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/01/2005

Re: None

Sunday, 07/02/2006 7:46:25 PM

Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:46:25 PM

Post# of 81782
Just sent this email I will be intersted to see how he reacts

Howard,

I was wondering if you and the insiders had thought of an approach that would help you stay away from a reverse split and still get your shares over $4. An idea I had that you might consider would be for the insiders to be willing to retire a large amount of their shares. Not only would this greatly lower the amount of outstanding shares you have, making the company greatly undervalued, but it would draw the right type of investors to your stock. The big investors stay away from the OTC because most CEOs are in it for themselves. You could show the investing public that you are serious about having the shareholder’s best interest at heart by retiring some of the shares you hold. This would quickly grow confidence from investors who would be very impressed by the management and insiders willing to make this move. I also truly believe that in the long run you, and all the insiders, would make much more money by retiring some of your shares than doing a reverse split, thus loosing those shares. If in conjunction with retiring stock you also began a stock buyback every quarter I believe you would have no problem getting your company to $4 a share and listed on the NASDAQ exchange. You might have to wait a few more quarters to get there as your sales grow and drive the share price, but it would be worth the wait to see your company fully valued on the OTC before NASDAQ buyers start buying up shares of your company.
Thank you for your time in considering this idea. I look forward to watching this company grow over the next year.

Sincerely,
Jeremy Miller

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CAPC News