This whole dispute has not been our patent dispute resolution's finest hour.
I'll say again that this is par for the course. There is a long history of important patent rulings being made by judges who are clearly opposed to the concept of patents (I've read many 10s of them) and/or are incapable of fairly basic logic.
Biggest question - how can any of the companies pay even the lost revenue, much less the damages. They can't turn back the clock and collect more from the payors so the lost revenue is in the billions given past and future.