Okay JohnnyDrama12, it hasn't been specified like that before now. Everybody keeps talking about whether we successfully completed the mini of the aircraft itself.
This is the first time I've heard that it is the airline that is trying to get Air Carrier certificate. And if that is true, what could BLTA possibly discovered that the FAA may have some concerns. Something with the airlines or with the plane itself.
The airline has to get the certification itself, not the plane. The crews need to prove to the FAA they can follow safety regulations and function properly in case of emergency.
The thing is, it is not specific as to what the FAA hold up is. It's allegedly something involving the deployment of a slide, however the Eastern Michigan team deemed it a pass despite a minor malfunction. The main Washington hub gives the final say. It's just known its the FAA, no outsider knows the exact, specific, dead-on reason as to why.
Shareholders have to be treated equally and that is why insider information is illegal. Investor relations has to tell all of the stockholders and everybody else at the same time any information that would affect the pps.
Agreed. However, what you're saying is not insider information. If you call the airline, as I have in the past and spoken to Investor Relations several times is that its the FAA. Any person, not even someone who owns a single darn share can call the airline and ask questions. I strongly suggest anyone to do so if they are uncertain of their position's future. The airline doesn't have to shove it in your face about what's going on with the FAA. That is up to you.