Moreover, I don’t think the V-Pak label change will materially alter ABBV’s exclusive contract with ESRX. ABBV would have a strong legal case, IMO, if ESRX tried to change the terms of the contract other than to ensure that V-Pak isn’t given to patients where it’s now contraindicated.
You sound like this is the first contract these guys wrote and signed. Companies of this size certainly would have a remedy included for many unforeseen situations. Unfortunately, we have no clue what is in the agreement.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.