What is apparent to me is that people come down with spontaneous eye problems when info is directly placed in front of them. WMI as deek posted held approx $2 billion in retained interests in securitized loans as at 2007/12, how then are those interests not protected if those majority investor owned loans are placed in "safe harbor"? That response was disingenous. Who worked at the bank and gave any such explanation? If you're referring to Exdimer, it is common knowledge that he left many years before any of this took place.