News Focus
News Focus
Followers 161
Posts 5310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2009

Re: fwh3334zeke post# 434616

Tuesday, 09/08/2015 6:43:02 AM

Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:43:02 AM

Post# of 749756
Eh FWH, go back and check your facts. I think you've got the recipient information wrong. The deposits went back to the original holders of the deposits. Not to the FDIC.

Think about it, you have $1m in deposits with a bank. The FDIC's exposure is $250/500k if the bank fails. The rules change, and the bank decides that all deposits of $1m are too 'expensive' for them to maintain.

So they tell the depositor that their business, of a $1m account, isn't cost-effective and to please withdraw and move their monies elsewhere.

Nowhere does the bank just give the FDIC that $1m.

(a) It's not theirs to give.
(b) While the FDIC rules and subsequent regulations may be the cause, it's not that the FDIC got the monies.

...Catz


.... Please, just call me Catz ;) - - - - - {and the requisite, all IMHO, do your own due diligence, and make your own investments}

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today