Solicitor General arguments are weak & logically flawed.
I find that statement silly, from an otherwise respected poster.
The SG arguments from legislative history and the language of the statute are clear and logical.
As anyone with experience knows, what courts will do is often uncertain and my sense is the uncertainty is increasing over time.
It is astonishing what foolish things one can temporarily believe if one thinks too long alone ... where it is often impossible to bring one's ideas to a conclusive test either formal or experimental. J.M. Keynes