News Focus
News Focus
Followers 762
Posts 43017
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 03/11/2004

Re: Ghors post# 59129

Monday, 07/27/2015 10:46:26 AM

Monday, July 27, 2015 10:46:26 AM

Post# of 68424
Yes, sir. I agree with that.



Ghors Member Level Monday, 07/27/15 10:04:11 AM
Re: Delroy post# 59128
Post # of 59131

Delroy: Actually, I believe your statement is semi correct. VRNG appealed several errors of the trial court, including the devastating laches decision. As I recall, Google also appealed several issues including running royalties. Unless I am corrected, the CAFC did not reach these issues when it threw VRNG out on obviousness. Therefore, while the Supremes may reverse and render on obviousness, I believe the CAFC will have to go back into the case and deal with the remaining issues. Should they then reverse the laches ruling, we may get a further remand for retrial of past damages.

IMO

ghors



I am not a broker and profess to know nothing about trading stocks. Do your own DD. Buy, don't buy...sell, or don't sell at your own risk.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y