Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:46:56 AM
Yes pmcb did withdraw their application after being asked some basic questions by the EMEA. Why they couldn't answer them is concerning to say the least.
As agreed during the previous meeting, a list of issues was sent to the sponsor for response. The sponsor was asked to clarify the following issues:
• Intention to diagnose, prevent or treat To establish correctly if there exists a scientific rationale for the development of the proposed product for treatment of pancreatic cancer, the sponsor was asked to further elaborate on:
- details on the proposed product, in particular the rationale for the proposed formulation;
- details on the clinical studies, in particular patients’ characteristics and treatment protocols. • Significant benefit The arguments on significant benefit are based on a potential improved efficacy in the condition. The sponsor was requested to further discuss the arguments provided for significant benefit and to elaborate on:
- the comparison of the results for the preliminary clinical studies with the current standard of care for a similar population in the context of current European guidelines. In the written response, and during an oral explanation before the Committee on 9 December 2014, the sponsor discussed in particular two available preliminary clinical studies in patients affected by the condition. The COMP considered in particular that the positioning of the product vis a vis the currently available products was not clear.
In communicating to the sponsor the outcome of the discussion, the sponsor formally withdrew the application for orphan designation, on 11 December 2014, prior to final opinion.
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Minutes/2015/01/WC500180860.pdf
As agreed during the previous meeting, a list of issues was sent to the sponsor for response. The sponsor was asked to clarify the following issues:
• Intention to diagnose, prevent or treat To establish correctly if there exists a scientific rationale for the development of the proposed product for treatment of pancreatic cancer, the sponsor was asked to further elaborate on:
- details on the proposed product, in particular the rationale for the proposed formulation;
- details on the clinical studies, in particular patients’ characteristics and treatment protocols. • Significant benefit The arguments on significant benefit are based on a potential improved efficacy in the condition. The sponsor was requested to further discuss the arguments provided for significant benefit and to elaborate on:
- the comparison of the results for the preliminary clinical studies with the current standard of care for a similar population in the context of current European guidelines. In the written response, and during an oral explanation before the Committee on 9 December 2014, the sponsor discussed in particular two available preliminary clinical studies in patients affected by the condition. The COMP considered in particular that the positioning of the product vis a vis the currently available products was not clear.
In communicating to the sponsor the outcome of the discussion, the sponsor formally withdrew the application for orphan designation, on 11 December 2014, prior to final opinion.
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Minutes/2015/01/WC500180860.pdf
Recent PMCB News
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:17:39 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:17:24 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:17:06 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:16:53 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 08:19:59 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/17/2026 07:49:54 PM
- Form ARS - Annual Report to Security Holders • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 01:40:00 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 10:02:46 AM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/27/2026 10:05:45 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/07/2026 10:43:33 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/07/2026 10:43:16 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/18/2025 10:04:23 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/15/2025 09:00:20 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/12/2025 10:07:16 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/05/2025 10:00:25 PM
- PharmaCyte Biotech stock surges following profitable exit from Femasys investment • IH Market News • 11/25/2025 03:56:47 PM
- PharmaCyte Biotech Successfully Monetizes Femasys Stake, Strengthening Cash Position and Underscoring Strategic Capital Deployment • Business Wire • 11/25/2025 02:15:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/18/2025 09:32:29 PM
- Form 8-K/A - Current report: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/18/2025 09:05:32 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 08:05:33 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/06/2025 09:08:43 PM
