Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,816.89
(
-0.11%
)
US TECH 100
24,499.60
(
0.38%
)
Dow Jones
47,916.57
(
-0.56%
)
Brent Oil
92.41
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
71,446.39
(
-2.23%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 93862
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Sosoomee

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 85
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/28/2001

Sosoomee

Re: Cassandra post# 39442

Thursday, 06/26/2003 10:17:52 PM

Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:17:52 PM

Post# of 93862
Casssandra,
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the fact that the note you are referring to is unsecured and references that "the holders of the notes mayhave the right" to take ahold of property is just saying that it is within the realm of possibilities that the unsecured creditor might secure their debt to property. This is plain english to me, are you confused again?

People who spend 24-7 discussing something they claim to have absolutely no interest in should be muzzled.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today