InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,815.26
(
-0.76%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.20
(
-1.30%
)
Dow Jones
42,740.42
(
-0.75%
)
Brent Oil
74.30
(
-0.23%
)
Bitcoin
67,014.00
(
0.01%
)
Post# of 93824
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Sosoomee

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 85
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/28/2001

Sosoomee

Re: Cassandra post# 39442

Thursday, 06/26/2003 10:17:52 PM

Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:17:52 PM

Post# of 93824
Casssandra,
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the fact that the note you are referring to is unsecured and references that "the holders of the notes mayhave the right" to take ahold of property is just saying that it is within the realm of possibilities that the unsecured creditor might secure their debt to property. This is plain english to me, are you confused again?

People who spend 24-7 discussing something they claim to have absolutely no interest in should be muzzled.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up