"The restaurant? 11th hour game changers happen and if anyone invested based on a con-call without the company actually physically possessing the real-estate, that's on them. That's not on $SLNX" I think you keep missing the point on purpose by avoiding the facts. you're deflecting from the fact that it was Charles himself who said the ONLY porpose of the closure is 'the move to a better location' but facts show that SLNX didn't have the money to keep paying rent and their utility bills. Had Charles stated that the 'Restaurant is failing and we don't have the money to pay rent and therefore we're closing it down,' I would regard that as the honest and transparent thing to do and wouldn't bring this up. Do you get it now?