InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 2968
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2014

Re: specutator post# 107194

Thursday, 04/30/2015 11:02:20 AM

Thursday, April 30, 2015 11:02:20 AM

Post# of 123645
Tortious interference in Marani's business? What would that be? Is there a statute you could cite? Regardless, the thought that Margrit would have decimated shareholders as she has in order to hire lawyers to take an offensive legal position with a futile legal assault that had no chance of any financial effect whatsoever is uncoscienceable.

Conversely, to believe that Margrit did such because there was something ultimately in it for her is far more believable. Margrit and Margrit alone was the only one capable of doing the convertible deals. Margrit exclusively was the only person capable of having legend removed and arranging opinion. She had to know exactly what would happen in doing so. If the intent was to build a real company all of that would be suicide. The only logical reason to do so would be to make money elsewhere, like in stock. Let's not forget Margrit made over $4 million in personal compensation in 2009 for six months of employment from a dormant MRIB not selling any vodka at the time. Almost all of that was in stock and the cash portion represented more than 100% of Marani gross sales for the year, MRIBs best, all executed by her predecessors in the form of Paul Fuegner who she burned just like Dan Senters. All about the stock. All about the financing. All about keeping all the money in a tight circle.