No need to see the insides, the evidence to the contrary is quite clear.
Pre-Inspection report clearly indicates once the pods are in place another inspection would be necessary.
September town council meeting, councilor quotes the town building superintendent the buildings are empty shells, non-operational. Then some discussion ensues about how permits would be required but no permits have been issued.
November company open house, company reps using photographs of a Texas company (credited to a Japanese company by company reps) state that when building is completed it would look something like this.
Bill claims in earlier interviews, prior to the pre-inspection in July they had spent $16 million (although this number has ranged between 12-16 million depending on Bills moods I guess) on the building. In May Bill stated they were complete, pharma grade facility, laid out like a pharma company but the above indicates that was/is not the case.
Now, let's remove all shades of grey here. Why would a business, and Bill is supposedly a business god according to his Billievers, spend the above quoted amounts when there are no guarantee's they will be granted a license? Does not sound like sound business practise to me. Bill is going to have to prove to the judicial review judge he has in fact actually completed the inside of the building(s), enough to satisfy a judge he is not lying. Any legal non-conforming challenge will use expenditure as "intent" under that framework but an absence of a build out despite claims to the contrary will not sit well.
so in my assumption, given the above, no way is there anything in those buildings except air.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
