News Focus
News Focus
Followers 42
Posts 9139
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 09/06/2014

Re: dcspka post# 29171

Sunday, 04/19/2015 12:52:05 PM

Sunday, April 19, 2015 12:52:05 PM

Post# of 30047
Evidently there are no CIT Results to withhold.

Evidently there were no CIT Phase II or Phase III studies.

Evidently there has been no activity by anyone regarding CIT since Radient declared it worthless on December 31, 2010.

This is all evident to me because there has been no published data or news articles regarding CIT. On the contrary, the Radient 2011 10K says very clearly that Radient stopped working on CIT and licensed its inventor's more recent work from the University of Florida.

To say "there were studies and there was activity but it's being kept a secret until a later time" does not strike me as a good argument. But, I did not hold RXPC stock after the company announced that shares were being revoked. I accept that I have different risk tolerance than others and would not invest in a company that promised revenues and success and future studies in PR's but delivered the opposite or failed to deliver PERIOD.

In summary, I would like to see people either back up statements like "There was a Phase II study that ended on June 5 2013" or "Patents exist" with evidence, or stop stating conjecture as fact. "We can't find it because it's being kept a secret" is what I consider to be a laughable argument.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today