Home > Boards > US OTC > Cryptocurrency Industry > DNA Brands Inc. (DNAX)

I guess since "RETAIL" investors can't short a

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
boca_bobby Member Profile
 
Followed By 157
Posts 14,014
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/27/07
160x600 placeholder
Post-qualification Amendment to a 1-a Offering Statement (1-a Pos) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 10/21/2021 6:02:12 AM
Post-qualification Amendment to a 1-a Offering Statement (1-a Pos) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 9/27/2021 11:49:53 AM
Notice of Qualification [regulation A] (qualif) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 5/6/2021 6:11:47 AM
CEO Presenting at Emerging Growth Conference Virtually This Week InvestorsHub NewsWire - 4/28/2021 7:00:00 AM
CEO Presenting at Emerging Growth Conference Virtually This Week InvestorsHub NewsWire - 4/27/2021 7:00:00 AM
Amended Registration a Offering Under the Securities Act of 1933 (1-a/a) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 4/26/2021 12:32:56 PM
CEO Presenting at Emerging Growth Conference Virtually This Week InvestorsHub NewsWire - 4/26/2021 7:00:00 AM
Amended Registration a Offering Under the Securities Act of 1933 (1-a/a) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 4/13/2021 11:24:49 AM
Amended Registration a Offering Under the Securities Act of 1933 (1-a/a) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 3/30/2021 12:23:04 PM
Amended Registration a Offering Under the Securities Act of 1933 (1-a/a) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 3/19/2021 1:56:25 PM
1-z/a: Amendment to Exit Report Under Regulation a (1-z/a) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 3/9/2021 4:01:19 PM
Exit Report Under Regulation a (1-z) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 2/1/2021 2:57:51 PM
DNA Brands Sign Exclusive Software Acquisition Agreement to Acquire DNATags(R) InvestorsHub NewsWire - 1/25/2021 10:51:08 AM
Reflects Information That Constitutes a Substantive Change From or Addition to the Information Set Forth in the Last Offering... Edgar (US Regulatory) - 12/14/2020 10:46:55 AM
Current Report Pursuant to Regulation a (1-u) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 12/14/2020 10:46:05 AM
boca_bobby   Friday, 04/17/15 10:32:34 AM
Re: Ed the Trader post# 20702
Post # of 58297 
I guess since "RETAIL" investors can't short a stock that is priced at .0001 the whole concept is just ludicrous. Get real.

Oh, by the way. I lived in Boca Raton for years and had friends "working" for DNAX. I have visited the old and new wharehouses. I've posted many pictures as well. I've had sit downs with Mel and Darren and spoke at great length about this company. Of course at the time I had these talks many of my ideas were just "yes's to death" and never implemented. Or they we tried with only a half ass attempt to see what the results were before the whole idea was played out.

I came to understand very quickly that management just wanted "yes men" advising them. The whole idea of capturing a little market share in one area before expanding was never in the cards. They should have tried to build a brand name in Central Florida were they once had strong sales but failed to stay on top of it.

They just tried to expand way too quickly and now the whole thing is over. When they had radio play by Bubba's Army they should have used their money for cable advertising in the Central Florida area. When they were really entrenched there, South Florida would have been the next logical step.

Instead they had this idea that they needed to sponsor these bmx athletes in hopes of capturing the teenagers that follow the sport. I was continually told how loyal energy drink users are and they had to do it this way. Yet the whole Latin community in South Florida was ripe for the taking. Just silly if you ask me.

But now we are where we are and you folks think buying more .0001 shares will give this company a 3rd or 4th chance? It's over, move on

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences