"We should note that the Nature article is from January 2012."
That's the entire point- and what has changed since then? ANOTHER major change of the Sr mgt ranks being purged, SEC violations post the NATURE article in which a very talented, highly qualified peer stated, "Can a company with a checkered past be trusted?" meaning he hit it right on the "money" IMO when stating that in 2012.
Every single time ACTC/OCAT says it's "all different this time, trust us" - it sure seems to always turn out too be pretty much the same old broken record IMO. 15 yrs of it essentially. Is the big Phase II FDA trial even underway yet or even funded yet, end of Q-1 2015 now?
What's the share price done since that Nature article was written? Any products or major, large trials now completed and even remotely close to FDA approval since that Nature article was written in 2012? How much in $millions worth of fines and legal settlements were paid out of shareholder's money since that Nature article was written? Another major purge of nearly the entire Sr mgt ranks and another new CEO has occurred since that Nature article was written (typically a sign of major instability and failure in public traded firms). More insider selling, dumping and self-enrichment since that Nature article was written.
So what exactly has "changed" since 2012 when that was written? Looks pretty much all the same to me- all the same as that article in Nature explains very clearly IMO.
