News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257320
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122828
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: DFRAI post# 189260

Friday, 03/27/2015 12:40:51 PM

Friday, March 27, 2015 12:40:51 PM

Post# of 257320

CNAT—why is it that biopsies were not done to measure efficacy...?

This was a biomarker trial; showing clinical efficacy in NAFLD/NASH would require a different kind of trial that would include before-and-after biopsies.

Are they going to start phase-3 based on surrogate-marker endpoints?

That’s the plan, although it’s not yet clear which kinds of liver-disease patients will be enrolled in this trial. The results of the other phase-2 trials reading out in 2015 will guide this decision.

Will FDA approve such a trial?

The FDA recently published guidelines (in conjunction with AASLD) on acceptable surrogate markers for NASH, so the idea of seeking accelerated approval based on a set of such biomarkers is consistent with the FDA’s current thinking.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today