Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:32:41 PM
Data indicates AOT suppresses turbulence on Keystone pipeline
From the summary of Professor Tao’s paper posted by Moorea9
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/j0qj5i3lb5hqy6y/AAAiWH58qZc0l2qKEDQ8IVxRa?dl=0
the following can be deduced.
Under turbulent flow, the power savings are not more than 1:2 of the viscosity reduction. The keystone pipeline is definitely turbulent flow.
Because of this, if the Keystone pipeline was still turbulent with AOT on, the cap on power savings would be 50%, approximately.
However, the Keystone power reduction was 75%.
Power savings of over 50% are possible but ONLY under laminar flow.
This implies clearly that AOT is suppressing turbulence and creating laminar flow on the Keystone pipeline because it’s the only way you can achieve savings beyond 50%.
Naturally we await further detail supporting this when Professor Tao presents today.
Regarding you timing question, scientific papers take considerable time to be published from the date they are submitted. The summary above links to the abstract of the paper which shows it was submitted in April 2013, revised August 2014 and published January 2015.
From the summary of Professor Tao’s paper posted by Moorea9
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/j0qj5i3lb5hqy6y/AAAiWH58qZc0l2qKEDQ8IVxRa?dl=0
the following can be deduced.
Under turbulent flow, the power savings are not more than 1:2 of the viscosity reduction. The keystone pipeline is definitely turbulent flow.
Because of this, if the Keystone pipeline was still turbulent with AOT on, the cap on power savings would be 50%, approximately.
However, the Keystone power reduction was 75%.
Power savings of over 50% are possible but ONLY under laminar flow.
This implies clearly that AOT is suppressing turbulence and creating laminar flow on the Keystone pipeline because it’s the only way you can achieve savings beyond 50%.
Naturally we await further detail supporting this when Professor Tao presents today.
Regarding you timing question, scientific papers take considerable time to be published from the date they are submitted. The summary above links to the abstract of the paper which shows it was submitted in April 2013, revised August 2014 and published January 2015.
Recent QSEP News
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 08:30:29 PM
- QS Energy Positions AOT 3.0 for Full‑Pipeline, Global Deployment • ACCESS Newswire • 12/23/2025 02:00:00 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:01:43 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/25/2025 12:30:27 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/20/2025 04:00:08 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2025 08:02:20 PM
