"Apparently by thinking of the price per share I should not be concerned if I buy 10K shares at .32 as much as I should if I buy 100 shares of a stock at $32". Strange rationalization!"
Not strange to me....A stock that trades at a low of .26 obviously has a great deal of risk from the get go...up front. That's a no brainer. No one should be questioning the risk here.
How much money you put into the stock is your problem, but don't bs and say you didn't pick a penny because you thought the road to riches would be quicker and more powerful then that $32 dollar stock that you would only have 100 shares of.
And what are the similarity's to ENRON exactly? What about worldcom? How do they really compare? you wrote....
"we can make comparisons in regard to misleading investors, committing fraud, being corrupt, deceiving others, providing screwed up financials, stating that something will happen by a certain date and then giving no further word when that date comes and goes, etc etc"
Committing Fraud? Being corrupt? Wow. Strong words and amazing foresight.
Can't find another penny stock to compare NMKT to?
Apples to apples please. That's all I ask.
"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times; it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness;
-- Charles Dickens
