News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257441
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122884
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: ghmm post# 187636

Thursday, 02/19/2015 9:18:38 AM

Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:18:38 AM

Post# of 257441
OCRX—I’m not concerned about OCR-002’s efficacy per se, but rather about the phase-2b trial design in HE where OCRX has modeled a 23% improvement for OCR_002 + SoC relative to SoC alone. The problem here is that the SoC, a laxative detested by patents and hospital staff, actually world fairly well, so showing an incremental statsig improvement by adding OCR-002 may be tough.

If it were strictly up to me, the goal of the phase-2b trial would be to show non-inferiority relative to the SOC on efficacy (removal of ammonia) and superiority relative to the SoC on some composite measure of patient and hospital-staff satisfaction. Of course, the FDA would be unlikely to agree to such a design in phase-3, which is why OCRX isn’t using such a design.

In any case, the phase-2b trial is expected to have a futility and enrollment-size analysis any day, and is expected to report final data by late 2015 (subject to a robust enrollment rate).

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today