Tuesday, February 10, 2015 3:15:25 AM
You're argument is that SUGO wants to shell shares and nothing else (i.e., their device is simply a useless paper weight) - prove this. Prove it. The ball's in your court on this matter. Nothing else you say is even close to important as you proving this matter.
Not really in my court but SUGO, Caervision and Vitall are the ones who have the ball. They just don't want to share the ball with with us. I would say it is more important for the company to tells us more information than they have to date.
I do like your analogy and I think you hit the nail smack on the head.
We all know a good number of mergered tickers that have run multiple hundreds and thousands of percentages before changing their ticker name, BEFORE even changing their name, and some that never even bothered to change them - true share selling schemes. I can name examples of this if you wish - several tickers
Recent SLDC News
- Form QUALIF - Notice of Qualification [Regulation A] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/01/2025 04:15:08 AM
- Form 1-A - Offering Statement [Regulation A] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/09/2025 09:08:05 PM

