News Focus
News Focus
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

Re: mas post# 4887

Thursday, 05/11/2006 1:31:20 PM

Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:31:20 PM

Post# of 6903
Re: Only a persistent obstinate fool would contend otherwise with these actual 20% figures being quoted.

You've described yourself exactly, since you are the one looking at "up to 20%" and obstinately and persistently claiming it is an "actual 20%" figure. The only difference is that you are finding multiple links that repeat the same quote, but you can find a million, and it still doesn't change the fact that it's based on a quote that puts 20% on the optimistic side of expectations.

As Chipguy said, pointer rich code misses cache a lot and relies on memory. And sparse transfers will lose the benefit of pipelining, so first-to-load latency becomes a first-order performance limiter. But even in those cases, you don't miss cache 100% of the time, so those 50% savings in first-to-load latency don't ever gain 50% in performance. According to AMD, up to 20% is possible, but you will most likely see less than this in most apps.

Get over it. You lost this one, Mas.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today