The Question and Answer Board

[Georgia Bard]

I disagree because the SEC focuses on P&D and is beginning to look into short and distort. The fact is when I was before them and they went through 10,000 + posts they focused on posts that did not have a solid uunderlying basis.

I supplied it by referencing certain public information. They wanted names of where I was responsible and mad the verification which I supplied. But after that it was on the various P&Ds and boy I had plenty of information there.

I even saw where they finally went after Stock 4 tomorrow and MArk SHultz that nailed me when I first came into the market.

You can try but you can't stop people from doing stupid investments. You can try to educate but even then they will still try to catch a wave only to get hung. Greed ... when someone figures out how to people should control their greed and use common sense people will always be doing things that cost them money.

Most of the time it is their own fault and want someone to blame and make it right. Most rarely even read the filings till after they are hung. These sites are protected under the library Law and if some can get the yang then the ying will follow.

I am an advocate if a post does not have an underlying basis on a moderate site it is the responsiblility of the moderator to felete it and aks for the underlying basis. Nothing wrong with that because in testimony or court you have to have it.

:=) Gary Swancey