News Focus
News Focus
Followers 33
Posts 2959
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/02/2013

Re: Luckytriple7s post# 30310

Sunday, 02/01/2015 12:32:16 PM

Sunday, February 01, 2015 12:32:16 PM

Post# of 129206
Lucky, you need to be realistic!

Why would a company like UA do a deal with these guys for a beverage?

Why wouldn't they just come up with one on their own, market and sell it under their hugely own branded name 'Under Armor', call it Under Armor Beverage, or something like that?

These guys are failures, have a very poor track record, why would UA take a chance with them by licensing them and allowing them the chance to cause problems with their prized name?

If they are looking at the product and love it, nothing is stopping them from sending to a lab and getting it analyzed and recreating it exactly and produce it themselves!

This is not a patented item you know!!!!!!

UA is a multi billion dollar company.

They don't need these two ass wipes if they want to market and sell a beverage product!!!!!

Time to come back to earth!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y