News Focus
News Focus
Followers 38
Posts 2971
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2012

Re: InternetForumUser post# 202384

Monday, 01/12/2015 5:51:11 PM

Monday, January 12, 2015 5:51:11 PM

Post# of 347009

BMS ENROLLMENT COMPLETED: ~November 26, 2013, So BMS took around 14 months to enroll 264 Patients at 106 sites.

So if PPHM P3 has been ongoing for about 12 months but with around 152 sites. So would one expect PPHM to have enrolled at least 264 Patients in that same time frame?

Is PPHM enrolling at a faster rate or slower rate? If the P3 kept to the exact same timeline as the BMS Trial.. then April 2016 would be the date; however, I doubt the timelines between the two trials would be so similar.

While we don't know PPHM enrollment rate, I do not believe that they are ccomparable. Remember that Squamous NSCLC is not as prevalent as Non-squamous NSCLC. Just something to keep in mind.

Cheers.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y