Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:28:59 AM
In reply to your question.
Obviously many companies trade of their future potential such a biopharm, gold exploration and new tech companies, so I have never claimed that GCEI should only trade on their assets.
What proof do you have of their technology? I have been hearing it for 7 years now. And if the technology was so good and so hot and they have all these deals with Fortune 500 companies why haven't these Fortune 500 companies bought them for what would be a rounding error on their balance sheet.
SEVEN YEARS I have been hearing how amazing their technology is and what do we have? They installed a plant in Vallyfield in 2009 per my previous post. Why haven't new municipalities lined up if the technology is so compelling? You would think that in the last 5 years at least one might have stepped up to the plate. And why aren't any of their 'deals' updated in the Dec. 29th update?
So the answer to your question is simple:
1. We have no evidence of a proven, differntiating and compelling technology.
2. We have a management with a checkered past and no management experience.
3. We have a problem of credibility - lots of promises and ZERO delivered.
4. We have a management and board that has enriched themselves at the expense of the shareholders.
Do you need any more reasons?
Obviously many companies trade of their future potential such a biopharm, gold exploration and new tech companies, so I have never claimed that GCEI should only trade on their assets.
What proof do you have of their technology? I have been hearing it for 7 years now. And if the technology was so good and so hot and they have all these deals with Fortune 500 companies why haven't these Fortune 500 companies bought them for what would be a rounding error on their balance sheet.
SEVEN YEARS I have been hearing how amazing their technology is and what do we have? They installed a plant in Vallyfield in 2009 per my previous post. Why haven't new municipalities lined up if the technology is so compelling? You would think that in the last 5 years at least one might have stepped up to the plate. And why aren't any of their 'deals' updated in the Dec. 29th update?
So the answer to your question is simple:
1. We have no evidence of a proven, differntiating and compelling technology.
2. We have a management with a checkered past and no management experience.
3. We have a problem of credibility - lots of promises and ZERO delivered.
4. We have a management and board that has enriched themselves at the expense of the shareholders.
Do you need any more reasons?
Recent GCEI News
- Global Clean Energy Inc. Acquires AI for Natural Disasters to Expand Disaster Prediction and Emergency Response Platform. • PR Newswire (US) • 05/27/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Global Clean Energy Inc. Highlights Flamelit's Proven AI Delivery Across Public Sector, Healthcare, Security, and Data Infrastructure • PR Newswire (US) • 04/29/2026 01:10:00 PM
- GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY INITIATIVES LAUNCHES "AI FOR HUMANITY" MISSION • PR Newswire (US) • 03/11/2026 05:18:00 PM
- Global Clean Energy Acquires Flamelit to Accelerate AI-Driven Resilience • PR Newswire (US) • 02/24/2026 02:10:00 PM
